A ready-to-use list of your proven coping strategies for overwhelmed moments, built from evidence-based techniques and your real-world experience.

Some clients find it useful to build a personal menu of strategies for different emotional states before they need them - would creating that kind of resource feel like a useful exercise?
A VP of Operations describes his coping strategy as exercise: when work gets difficult, he runs. This works until it doesn't — when he's traveling, when he's injured, when the situation requires him to be present rather than absent. In those circumstances he reports becoming visibly short-tempered and withdrawing from his team. He has one strategy, and when it's unavailable, he has nothing.
Frame this as a toolkit expansion exercise, not a stress management protocol. 'You have one excellent strategy. This worksheet maps four kinds of situations that require different responses — calm-down, energy-up, connection-seeking, and perspective-gaining. Running solves one of those four. We're going to fill in the rest.' The resistance to watch for: clients who have a successful coping strategy often feel that discussing alternatives implies their current strategy is inadequate. Name it: 'Running works. The question is what you do when running isn't available — and right now the answer is nothing.'
Watch which sections of the playlist fill easily and which produce minimal entries. The sparse sections are the underdeveloped coping categories. For a client who is physically active and relationally reserved, the connection and perspective sections are often thin. Also watch for quality of entries: 'call someone' in the connection section is a placeholder; 'call my brother and tell him specifically what's happening' is a strategy. Push for the specific version.
After completing the playlist, identify the situation in which he is most frequently caught without a working strategy — typically a high-stress travel week or an injury period. 'Looking at the playlist, which three strategies here could you deploy from a hotel room with 20 minutes available?' This makes the toolkit immediately applicable rather than aspirational. Let him choose; don't suggest.
If the client's sole coping strategy involves physical withdrawal from the environment and the presence of others — running, solo hiking, extended physical activity — and he reports significant difficulty returning to engagement after using the strategy, consider whether the coping is also functioning as avoidance of interpersonal engagement. Severity: low. The playlist work remains appropriate, but note the pattern.
A senior leader describes her energy as unpredictable: some days she is fully present and high-performing, other days she hits a wall by 2 PM and the afternoon becomes unproductive. She attributes this to workload variability. In coaching she has not been able to identify what the high-energy days have in common or what the low-energy days have in common. She is managing energy reactively — responding to states as they appear rather than maintaining them intentionally.
Use the energy-up section of the playlist specifically as a starting point. 'I want to map what you actually do that reliably raises your energy — not what you think should work, what actually works for you. Then we'll build the full toolkit.' Clients who are high-functioning often resist energy management work because they've never needed explicit systems for it before. Normalize it: 'The more complex the role, the more intentional this needs to be. You wouldn't manage a complex project without a system; energy works the same way.'
Watch whether she can distinguish between activities that generate energy and activities that consume it with the feeling of accomplishment — these are often confused. Finishing a difficult deliverable may produce satisfaction but not energy. A genuine energy-generating activity produces a state shift toward engagement and presence. If she is populating the energy-up section with accomplishment-based activities rather than genuine energy-generators, the toolkit won't work.
After completing the playlist, focus on the energy-up and calm-down sections together. 'Your afternoon wall — based on what's on this playlist, what would you need in the 12 PM hour to change the 2 PM outcome?' This makes the playlist a predictive tool rather than a reactive one. The goal is to build one intentional mid-day practice from the playlist that she can test for two weeks.
If the energy wall is consistent, severe, and not responsive to any of the strategies she can identify — if she reports that nothing reliably works to shift her state in the afternoon — consider whether the energy management problem has a physical dimension (sleep, nutrition, underlying health) that coaching tools alone won't address. Severity: low. Suggest a physical health check-in if the pattern persists after toolkit implementation.
A manager at a technology company has been in a product launch crunch for three months. She describes a progressive narrowing: her world has contracted to the launch, her relationships outside work have atrophied, she has stopped doing things she finds meaningful, and she has a persistent sense that nothing she does is ever enough. She knows this is temporary but is losing the felt sense of perspective — intellectually she knows the crunch will end, but she cannot access that knowledge emotionally.
Target the perspective section of the playlist specifically. 'When sustained pressure narrows your world down to one thing, the things that give you a larger frame — reminders that there is more to your life and contribution than this project — are the ones that restore perspective. We're going to build a specific set of those that you can deploy in the next three weeks.' This framing makes the tool immediately applicable to the current situation rather than positioning it as general skill-building.
Watch whether the perspective activities she identifies are abstract or concrete. 'Remind myself this will end' is an abstract perspective activity; 'Read the message from my team after last year's launch' is a concrete one. The concrete version actually works in the moment; the abstract version often doesn't when you're in the middle of sustained pressure. Push for the concrete version: 'What would you actually look at, or do, or say to yourself in that moment?'
After completing the playlist, identify one item from the perspective section that she could do today — not after the launch, today. 'Which of these is available right now, even in the next 24 hours?' The immediacy is important: a toolkit that she plans to use after the pressure passes has already missed its window. If she can't identify one immediately available item, the perspective section isn't yet specific enough.
If the client's description of 'nothing being enough' extends beyond the professional domain — if she uses the same language about her parenting, her relationships, or herself as a person — the three-month crunch may have activated a more pervasive sense of inadequacy rather than a situational perspective loss. Severity: moderate. The playlist work remains appropriate for the current situation, but name the broader pattern if it appears: 'I'm hearing the same language about your team, your family, and yourself. Is that accurate?'
I swing between feeling flat and feeling overwhelmed and I don't know how to regulate in between
WellnessA client overwhelmed and needing a systematic way to understand and manage their stress
WellnessA client gets flooded by intense emotion and needs physiological tools to come down quickly




